ISSN   0974-3618  (Print)                    www.rjptonline.org

            0974-360X (Online)

 

 

RESEARCH ARTICLE

 

 

 

Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of

Neisseria gonorrhoeae in a Tertiary care Hospital

 

Bilal Ahmad Mir1*, Siddesh Basawaraj Sirwar2, Vijayaraghavan3

1Department of Microbiology, Khaja Banda Nawaz Institute of Medical Sciences, Gulbarga, 585104, India

2Department of Microbiology, ESCI Medical College, Gulbarga, 585104, India

3Director of Research, Saveetha University, Thandalam, Chennai, 602105, India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: bilalkbn@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

According to World Health Organization (WHO) estimates, Gonorrhoea is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in developing countries. Control of gonococcal infection is becoming increasingly difficult due to emergence of resistant strains to a wide range of antibitiotics. Recent studies have revealed a high level of resistance against antibiotics such as, penicillins and quinolones in several countries, including India. There is irrational and injudicious use of antibacterial agents, especially in the developing countries like India and is expected to worsen unless urgent and appropriate steps are initiated. This study was done with an objective to find out the prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. This was a prospective study conducted in a tertiary care hospital in South India from June 2013 to May 2015. Samples were collected from patients attending gynecology and STD clinic. All patients in reproductive age group who attended gynecology out patient with suspected STIs were included in the study. Antimicrobial sensitivity test was performed by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method using CLSI guidelines. The susceptibility to the following antimicrobial agents were assessed by: Penicillin (10 IU), Tetracycline (30μg), Ciprofloxacin (5μg), Ceftriaxone (30μg), Cefixime (5μg), Cefoxitin (30μg), Cefotaxime (10μg), Nalidixic acid (30μg). The criteria used to select the antimicrobial agents tested were based on their availability. N. gonorrhoeae ATCC 49226 strain and WHO reference strains A, C, E, G, J, K-Q were used as controls. A total of 546 samples were analyzed, out of which 49 (9%) were positive for N. gonorrhoeae. Increase in N. gonorrhoeae isolates which are resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents is now a serious problem7. In the present study maximum resistance was seen with Penicillin and no resistance was seen with Ceftriaxone and Cefixime. There is a geographical difference in resistance pattern of N. gonorrhoeae, some centres have highlighted an alarming increase in the percentage of Penicillin and Quinolones over the years8,9. Other studies from Nagpur (0%), Hyderabad (41.9%) and Kolkata (52.6%) have reported a lower percentage of Penicillin, findings similar to our study were reported from another WHO SEAR country, Thailand in 2013. Emergence of N. gonorrhoeae isolates with decreased susceptibility/resistance to ceftriaxone, as a consequence of excess utilisation of oral third-generation cephalosporins for other infectious conditions, may pose a serious threat in the management of gonorrhoea in countries like India. Antimicrobial surveillance should be done periodically to monitor the current susceptibility patterns in local hospitals. In most of the hospitals, sensitivity reports are not readily available, empirical therapy is often needed to. Regional antibiotic susceptibility studies will help in choosing an appropriate antibiotic for empirical therapy and reduce the mortality and morbidity.

 

KEYWORDS: Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Sexually transmitted infections (STI), Antibiogram, Cephalosporins

 

 


 

Received on 26.06.2015          Modified on 18.07.2015

Accepted on 23.07.2015        Š RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 8(9): Sept, 2015; Page 1217-1220

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00222.X

 

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION1-10:

According to World Health Organization (WHO) estimates, Gonorrhoea is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in developing countries1. Although Gonorrhoea is easily curable, but if remains undetected, untreated can lead to complications like pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, tubal factor infertility, adverse pregnancy outcomes in females, and testicular and prostate infections and infertility in males. Infection in pregnant women may lead to crucial perforation and blindness in the newborn. Gonococcal infections have also been documented to facilitate acquisition and transmission of HIV and HPV infection2,3 .

 

Control of gonococcal infection is becoming increasingly difficult due to emergence of resistant strains to a wide range of antibitiotics. Recent studies have revealed a high level of resistance against antibiotics such as, penicillins and quinolones in several countries, including India4. Between 2009 to 2012 penicillinase- producing Neisseria Gonorrhoeae (N. gonorrhoeae). N. gonorrhoeae isolates from WHO South East Asian Region varied from 0% (Pune, Nagpur) to 88.9% (Bhutan), while the rates of resistance to tetracycline and resistance to ciprofloxacin varied from 9.8%-100% and 57%-100%, respectively5. Gonococci have been adept at developing resistance to several commonly used antimicrobials.

 

Another cause of concern is, rate of gonorrhoea and other non-ulcerative STIs are difficult to determine because clinical presentation is not specific enough and facilities, materials, or personnel for laboratory based diagnosis are inadequate. Moreover, there is lack of reporting mechanism and reluctance to report STIs to public health authorities. Periodic Anti-microbial surveillance is, therefore, necessary determine the resistance patterns. There is irrational and injudicious use of antibacterial agents, especially in the developing countries like India and is expected to worsen unless urgent and appropriate steps are initiated. This study was done with an objective to find out the prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of N. gonorrhoeae

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

This was a prospective study conducted in a tertiary care hospital in South India from June 2013 to May 2015. Samples were collected from patients attending gynecology and STD clinic. All patients in reproductive age group who attended gynecology out patient with suspected STIs were included in the study. Women of reproductive age group (15-44 years) with any one of the sign and symptom for STIs such as pain during sexual intercourse, a painful or burning sensation when urinating and abnormal vaginal discharge were included. Corresponding symptoms in the males were included in the study. Others with symptoms indicating development of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID) like cramps and pain, bleeding between menstrual periods, vomiting, and fever were also included in the study. Patients on recent antibiotic treatment and those who were outside the reproductive age group were excluded from the study.

 

Clinical examination was done in all patients who were attending gynecological OPD. Two swabs were collected from each patient one for gram stain and the other for culture. The samples were immediately delivered and inoculated to appropriate media in Microbiology Laboratory. Stuart’s transport media was used at times of delay. While one of the two swabs taken from individual patient was used for gram stain the other was inoculated on to nonselective chocolate agar and selective agar modified Thayer-Martin medium. The inoculated plates were incubated at 35-36°C for 48 hrs in a moist atmosphere enriched with 5% CO2 using candle jar. N. gonorrhoeae produces small raised, grey shiny colonies on modified Thayer-Martin medium after overnight incubation. In general all positive cultures were identified by their characteristic appearance on the media, Gram staining reaction and confirmed by the pattern of biochemical reactions using the standard method6.

 

Antimicrobial sensitivity test was performed by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method using CLSI guidelines. The susceptibility to the following antimicrobial agents were assessed by: Penicillin (10 IU), Tetracycline (30μg), Ciprofloxacin (5μg), Ceftriaxone (30μg), Cefixime (5μg), Cefoxitin (30μg), Cefotaxime (10μg), Nalidixic acid (30μg). The criteria used to select the antimicrobial agents tested were based on their availability. N. gonorrhoeae ATCC 49226 strain and WHO reference strains A, C, E, G, J, K-Q were used as controls. The information was recorded and analyzed using Microsoft Excel (2007 version) and the results are explained in frequency and percentage.

 

RESULTS:

A total of 546 samples were analyzed, out of which 49 (9%) were positive for N. gonorrhoeae. The age and sex distribution of the cases is shown in table 1.

 

 

Table 1:Age and sex distribution of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Age group (years)

Male

Female

Total

15-20

21-25

26-30

31-40

41-45

Total

5

6

4

1

1

17

6

9

12

4

1

32

11

15  

16

5

2

49

Maximum number of cases were from females and in age group of 26-30 years.

 

 

 

The patterns of Neisseria gonorrhoeae was isolated is shown in table 2.

 

Table 2: Patterns of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates among males and females.

Specimen

Male

(n=17)

Female (n=32)

Urethral discharge

5

0

Vaginal discharge

-

10

Cervical discharge

-

6

Lower abdominal pain syndrome

2

6

Genital ulcer disease

1

3

nonherpetic

 

 

Genital ulcer disease herpetic

4

2

Genital scabies

2

3

Molluscum contagiosum

1

2

Balanoposthitis

2

-

Maximum isolates were from urethral discharge in males and vaginal discharge in females.

 

The reaction of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to various biochemical tests is shown in table 3.

 

Table 3: Gram satin, culture and reaction of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to various biochemical tests 

Test

Gram stain

Growth on Chocolate agar

Growth on modified Thayer martin media

Oxidase test

Positive

47

48

49

49

Negative

499

498

497

497

Total

 

 

 

546

 

The antibiogram of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae is shown in table 4.

 

Table 4: Antibiogram of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. (% resistance) (n=49)

Antibiotic

Number

Percentage

Penicillin

Tetracycline

Ciprofloxacin

Ceftriaxone

Cefotaxime

Cefoxitin

Cefixime

Nalidixic acid

35

31

24

0

14

12

0

27

71.4

63.2

48.9

0

28.5

24.4

0  

55.1

 

Maximum resistance was seen with Penicillin and no resistance was seen with Ceftriaxone.

 

DISCUSSION:

Increase in N. gonorrhoeae isolates which are resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents is now a serious problem7. In the present study maximum resistance was seen with Penicillin and no resistance was seen with Ceftriaxone and Cefixime. Antimicrobial susceptibility studies are required to monitor changing trends in resistance and helps in identifying new types of resistance. There is a geographical difference in resistance pattern of N. gonorrhoeae, some centres have highlighted an alarming increase in the percentage of Penicillin and Quinolones over the years8,9. Other studies from Nagpur (0%), Hyderabad (41.9%) and Kolkata (52.6%) have reported a lower percentage of Penicillin, findings similar to our study were reported from another WHO SEAR country, Thailand in 20135.

 

The prevalence of N. gonorrhoeae in the present study was 9%. The prevalence in this study is higher compared to other reports like Jordan 2.2% and Vietnam 0.7%10,11. Some studies have reported a higher prevalence12-14. In the present study there was female preponderance (table 2). A recent study conducted in India has reported only males being affected15. These variations might be due to geographical differences.

 

Cefixime is the first-line drug recommended under syndromic management of STIs according to the recent NACO guidelines for treatment of gonorrhea16. Treatment failure to cefixime has been reported from several countries like Japan, France, Canada, Austria and Norway17-19. Recently ceftriaxone resistant isolates have been identified in Japan (2009), France (2010) and Spain (2011)17,20,21. The high rate of resistance among N. gonorrhoeae isolates may be an indicator of inappropriate use of antimicrobials due availability of over-the-counter drugs, prescription by unqualified practitioners or self-medication22. Increase in N. gonorrhoeae isolates which are resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents is now a serious problem7. Emergence of N. gonorrhoeae isolates with decreased susceptibility/resistance to ceftriaxone, as a consequence of excess utilisation of oral third-generation cephalosporins for other infectious conditions, may pose a serious threat in the management of gonorrhoea in countries like India.

 

Antimicrobial surveillance should be done periodically to monitor the current susceptibility patterns in local hospitals. In most of the hospitals, sensitivity reports are not readily available, empirical therapy is often needed to. Regional antibiotic susceptibility studies will help in choosing an appropriate antibiotic for empirical therapy and reduce the mortality and morbidity. Every hospital should regularly conduct antibiogram studies, develop an antibiotic policy to promote rational use of antibiotics and emergence of resistance.

 

LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY:

The sample size was small and we did not evaluate co-infection with other STIs. Going forward we plan to conduct a study of gonococcal infection in HIV positive patients and compare the susceptibility bet HIV gonococcal and non HIV gonococcal cases. Future studies should focus on identifying behavioral or environmental factors to address differences in predictors within groups.

 

 

CONCLUSION:

In the present study, N. gonorrhoeae isolates showed resistance to commonly used anti-microbials except Ceftriaxone and Cefixime. Research into, and identification of alternate treatment regimens are integral part to prevent emergence of resistance. Results of the study support the current recommendations of NACO for use of third generation as the first choice drugs for the empirical treatment of gonorrhea in India.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

We authors thanks the staff of microbiology laboratory for the help in conducting this study

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

None

 

REFERENCES:

1.       Global incidence and prevalence of selected curable sexually transmitted infections-2008. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2012 Available from: http://www.who.int/ reproductivehealth/ publications/rtis/2008_STI_estimates. pdf. Last accessed on 4th March 2015 at 5pm.

2.       Laga M, et al. Non-ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases as risk factors for HIV-1transmission in women from a cohort study. AIDS 1993; 7:95-102.

3.       Quinn TC. Association of sexually transmitted diseases and 8. infection with the human immunodeficiency virus: biological cofactors and markers of behavioral interventions. Int J STD AIDS 1996; 7:17-24.

4.       Sethi S, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility and genetic characteristics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from India, Pakistan and Bhutan in 2007-2011. BMC Infect Dis 2013; 13:35.

5.       Bala M, et al. Members of Who gasp sear Network. Monitoring antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in selected countries of the WHO South-East Asia Region between 2009 and 2012: A retrospective analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2013; 89:28-35.

6.       Laboratory diagnosis of gonorrhoea. WHO regional publication: South-East Asia. New Delhi, India; 1999

7.       CDC. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2011. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2012.

8.       Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats11/surv2011. pdf. Last accessed 3rd March 2015 at 5pm.

9.       Bhalla P, at al. Antimicrobial susceptibility and plasmid profile of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in India (New Delhi). Sex Transm Infect 1998; 74:210-2.

10.     Khaki P, et al. Epidemiological analysis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates by antimicrobial susceptibility testing, auxotyping and serotyping. Indian J Med Microbiol 2007; 25:225-9.

11.     Mahafzah AM, at al. Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections among sexually active Jordanian females. J Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35(6):607-10.

12.     Pham Thi Lan, at al, Reproductive tract infections in women seeking abortion in Vietnam BMC Infect Dis, 2009;9(1):1-9,

13.     Menéndez C, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of sexually transmitted infections and cervical neoplasia in women from a rural area of southern Mozambique. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol, 2010; 11:60-93.

14.     Divekar AA, at al. Disease prevalence in women attending the STD clinic in Mumbai, India. Int J STD AIDS. 2000;11(1):45-8.

15.     Jatau, at al. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Neisseria gonococcal isolated from patients in various locations of Kaduna state, Nigeria Nigerian Journal of Surgical Research. 2003; 5(1):50-6.

16.     Bharara T, at al. Rising trend of antimicrobial resistance among Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates and the emergence of N. gonorrhoeae isolate with decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone. Indian J Med Microbiol 2015; 33:39-42.

17.     National AIDS Control Organization. National Guidelines on Prevention, Management and Control of RTI including STI.

18.     National AIDS Control Organization, Government of India. 2007. pp. 25.

19.     Unemo M, at al. High-level cefixime- and ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in France: Novel penA mosaic allele in a successful international clone causes treatment failure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56:1273-80.

20.     Yokoi S, et al. Threat to cefixime treatment for gonorrhoea. Emerg Infect Dis 2007; 13:1275-7.

21.     Unemo M, et al. Two cases of verified clinical failures using internationally recommended first-line cefixime for gonorrhea treatment, Norway, 2010. Euro Surveill 2010; 15.

22.     Ohnishi M, et al. Is Neisseria gonorrhoeae initiating a future era of untreatable gonorrhea?: Detailed characterization of the first strain with high-level resistance to ceftriaxone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55:3538-45.

23.     Camara J, et al. Molecular characterization of two high-level ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates detected in Catalonia, Spain. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012; 67:1858-60.

24.     Brhlikova P, et al. Trust and the regulation of pharmaceuticals: South Asia in a globalised world. Global Health 2011; 7:10.